I have reviewed the reference contract in detail. Paragraph B of the Services Terms and Conditions states in part as follows: " . . . Telephone Communications, Inc. will notify Customer, in writing, at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the Term, regarding the pending expiration of this Agreement and the automatic renewal of the Agreement if no action is taken prior to expiration."
As President and CEO of CareerLab, Mr. Frank represents that CareerLab did not receive any such notification sixty (60) days prior to the termination of the initial term of the Contract. The notification specifically requires the specific communication of the pending expiration of the Contract and its automatic renewal if no action is taken.
I do not believe a court of law would find that the "boilerplate" language in your monthly invoice in the paragraph entitled "Contact Renewal Information" would satisfy the quoted Contract language. The language quoted supra clearly requires a separate and additional notification to the Customer of the pending expiration of the Contract so the Customer can make a conscious decision as to whether to renew the Contract and for what period of term.
Allowing the Contract to terminate on November 30, 20-- without the imposition of any alleged termination charges would appear to be in the best interests of both CareerLab and Telephone Communications, Inc. The potential charges involved are not great from Telephone Comminication Inc.'s perspective although such could have an adverse impact of the business of CareerLab.